C RAJENDIRAN vs V SUNDRA MAHALINGAM — 1679/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 AND 142. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTU020126022024
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
04-10-2024
Filing Number
12221/2024
Filing Date
03-10-2024
Registration No
1679/2024
Registration Date
29-10-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C RAJENDIRAN
Adv. Sivaraj E
Respondent(s)
V SUNDRA MAHALINGAM
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 08-04-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 30-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 17-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 10-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination statement (S.T.C. No. 1679/2024) dated 28.10.2025 from the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Tirupathur, Tamil Nadu. The document records the complainant Rajendran's testimony in a loan/financial dispute case, where he details allegations against the defendant regarding an unpaid loan of ₹2,00,000, disputed promissory notes, interest calculations, bank transfers, and investment schemes. The court has recorded the witness's statement as admitted and acknowledged to be correct by the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination statement (S.T.C. No. 1679/2024) dated 28.10.2025 from the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Tirupathur, Tamil Nadu. The document records the complainant Rajendran's testimony in a loan/financial dispute case, where he details allegations against the defendant regarding an unpaid loan of ₹2,00,000, disputed promissory notes, interest calculations, bank transfers, and investment schemes. The court has recorded the witness's statement as admitted and acknowledged to be correct by the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts