INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUPATTUR TALUK PS vs THANGAMANI — 120/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),323,324,506(II),427. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020065072023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6505/2023
Filing Date
28-04-2023
Registration No
120/2023
Registration Date
28-04-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
THIRUPATHUR TALUK
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUPATTUR TALUK PS (Police Station)
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
THANGAMANI
RAMACHANDRAN
KASTHURI
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Disposed
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Framing of Charges
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Framing of Charges |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all three defendants (Thangamani, Ramachandran, and Kasthuri) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii), and 427, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the prosecution presented evidence of a confrontation at a V-Mart store on March 9, 2022, the testimonies of government witnesses were insufficient and contradictory to conclusively establish the defendants' guilt, and the court upheld the principle that doubt must benefit the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all three defendants (Thangamani, Ramachandran, and Kasthuri) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii), and 427, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the prosecution presented evidence of a confrontation at a V-Mart store on March 9, 2022, the testimonies of government witnesses were insufficient and contradictory to conclusively establish the defendants' guilt, and the court upheld the principle that doubt must benefit the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts