M Sankar vs R Devendhiran — 700894/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 200, 138, 420. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTU020054182024
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2024
Filing Number
704746/2024
Filing Date
20-03-2024
Registration No
700894/2024
Registration Date
20-03-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M Sankar
Adv. MOHAMED BILAL R
Respondent(s)
R Devendhiran
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order (STC No. 894/2024, dated 06.02.2026) from Thirupattur Judicial Magistrate Court documenting cross-examination testimony in a financial dispute case. The witness (Shankar, age 57) testified about lending ₹5 lakhs to the defendant on trust basis without written documentation, with the defendant promising repayment in three months; the defendant later provided a cheque that was rejected twice due to connectivity failure and "basement stopped" reasons, prompting the witness to file a legal notice through his advocate. The case appears to be in the examination/cross-examination phase with the witness providing detailed testimony about the transaction timeline and attempts to recover the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order (STC No. 894/2024, dated 06.02.2026) from Thirupattur Judicial Magistrate Court documenting cross-examination testimony in a financial dispute case. The witness (Shankar, age 57) testified about lending ₹5 lakhs to the defendant on trust basis without written documentation, with the defendant promising repayment in three months; the defendant later provided a cheque that was rejected twice due to connectivity failure and "basement stopped" reasons, prompting the witness to file a legal notice through his advocate. The case appears to be in the examination/cross-examination phase with the witness providing detailed testimony about the transaction timeline and attempts to recover the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts