STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPETOR OF POLICE JOLARPET PS vs Neelavathi and Others — 233/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),191(3),191(2). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020029002025
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
e-Filing Number
31-03-2025
Filing Number
2900/2025
Filing Date
16-05-2025
Registration No
233/2025
Registration Date
16-05-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
FIR Details
FIR Number
716
Police Station
JOLARPET POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY SUB INSPETOR OF POLICE JOLARPET PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Neelavathi and Others
Ranjeena
Sasikumar
Prabu
Madhakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 02-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 17-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document records witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 233/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate, Tirupathur, dated January 19, 2026. Two prosecution witnesses (Krinan Thanan and Naveen Kumar) testified regarding an alleged assault incident on December 3, 2024, where they claimed defendants attacked them with sticks and attempted to damage their house gate. Both witnesses identified the accused and physical evidence (sticks); cross-examination was offered but defendants declined to conduct it, so it was concluded. The case proceedings remain ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document records witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 233/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate, Tirupathur, dated January 19, 2026. Two prosecution witnesses (Krinan Thanan and Naveen Kumar) testified regarding an alleged assault incident on December 3, 2024, where they claimed defendants attacked them with sticks and attempted to damage their house gate. Both witnesses identified the accused and physical evidence (sticks); cross-examination was offered but defendants declined to conduct it, so it was concluded. The case proceedings remain ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts