THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATTRAMPALLI P.S. vs SRINIVASAN Advocate - SIVA M — 123/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020027912020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2787/2020
Filing Date
23-09-2020
Registration No
123/2020
Registration Date
24-09-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATTRAMPALLI P.S.
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
SRINIVASAN Advocate - SIVA M
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Disposed
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 17-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the defendant (Srinivasan) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 324 (causing hurt), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant initially testified about being abused and stabbed with a knife, the court found that the investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt, especially when key witnesses contradicted or failed to corroborate the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the defendant (Srinivasan) of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language), 324 (causing hurt), and 506(ii) (criminal intimidation), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant initially testified about being abused and stabbed with a knife, the court found that the investigating officer's testimony alone was insufficient to establish guilt, especially when key witnesses contradicted or failed to corroborate the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts