D KRISHNAN vs V UVARAJ — 1107/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTU020027802025

Evidence

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

13-05-2025

Filing Number

2780/2025

Filing Date

14-05-2025

Registration No

1107/2025

Registration Date

14-05-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138, 142
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)
MP/2/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section D KRISHNANV UVARAJ

Petitioner(s)

D KRISHNAN

Adv. D MANI

Respondent(s)

V UVARAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

09-04-2026

Evidence

02-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

The document appears to be a Tamil court order from Tirupathur Judicial Magistrate Court (Case No. S.T.C. 1107/2025, dated 12.03.2026) involving a cross-examination of witness P. Krishnan (age 74). The order records the witness's testimony regarding disputed claims about a settlement agreement from 2021, monetary transactions, and service of legal notices, with the witness denying or expressing uncertainty about various allegations. The court directs that the case be dismissed/struck off as the defendant has no connection to the case, as per applicable rules of procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The document appears to be a Tamil court order from Tirupathur Judicial Magistrate Court (Case No. S.T.C. 1107/2025, dated 12.03.2026) involving a cross-examination of witness P. Krishnan (age 74). The order records the witness's testimony regarding disputed claims about a settlement agreement from 2021, monetary transactions, and service of legal notices, with the witness denying or expressing uncertainty about various allegations. The court directs that the case be dismissed/struck off as the defendant has no connection to the case, as per applicable rules of procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case