SI OF POLICE GRP JOLARPET vs ALAMELU R — 148/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120B,379 IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020023392019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2336/2019
Filing Date
18-03-2019
Registration No
148/2019
Registration Date
19-03-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE GRP JOLARPET
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
ALAMELU R
PAGALAMMAL
RAJANDRAN
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirupathur acquitted three accused persons (Alamelu, Pagalammal, and Rajendran) of theft and conspiracy charges under IPC sections 379 and 120-B, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite alleged confessions and property recovery, significant contradictions existed between witness testimonies and investigative officer accounts, rendering the circumstantial evidence unreliable and insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirupathur acquitted three accused persons (Alamelu, Pagalammal, and Rajendran) of theft and conspiracy charges under IPC sections 379 and 120-B, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite alleged confessions and property recovery, significant contradictions existed between witness testimonies and investigative officer accounts, rendering the circumstantial evidence unreliable and insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts