SI OF POLICE TIRUPATTUR TALUK PS vs MOHAN P Advocate - P.MONIMOZHLI — 133/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),321,324,506(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020020472019
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2046/2019
Filing Date
06-03-2019
Registration No
133/2019
Registration Date
06-03-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
FIR Details
FIR Number
740
Police Station
THIRUPATHUR TALUK
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE TIRUPATTUR TALUK PS (Police Station)
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
MOHAN P Advocate - P.MONIMOZHLI
A2.MADHAVAN
Adv. P.MANIMOLZHI
A3.PONNAN
Adv. P.MANIMOLZHI
A4.KUPPAMMAL
Adv. P.MANIMOLZHI
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 26-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 18-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness examination record from Criminal Case No. 133/2019 dated 27.05.2025 from the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Tirupathur. The witness (Palani s/o Ponnnan, age 40) provided testimony denying charges related to an assault case and clarifying details about land disputes and his injuries. The court recorded his examination-in-chief statements, which he acknowledged as correct after the testimony was read over and interpreted to him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness examination record from Criminal Case No. 133/2019 dated 27.05.2025 from the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Tirupathur. The witness (Palani s/o Ponnnan, age 40) provided testimony denying charges related to an assault case and clarifying details about land disputes and his injuries. The court recorded his examination-in-chief statements, which he acknowledged as correct after the testimony was read over and interpreted to him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts