SI of Police, Taluk PS vs Kalaimathi — 876/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTU020017642026

Filing Number

1761/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

876/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

THIRUPATHUR TALUK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police, Taluk PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalaimathi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Tirupathur rejected the bail application of A2.Kalaimathi, who was arrested on 26.02.2026 for alleged offences under BNS sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), and 49. The court denied bail at this juncture citing that the investigation is in its initial stage, case property (2gm gold and Rs.1,05,000) remains unrecovered, and there is a risk of the accused repeating offences or tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 876/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Tirupathur rejected the bail application of A2.Kalaimathi, who was arrested on 26.02.2026 for alleged offences under BNS sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), and 49. The court denied bail at this juncture citing that the investigation is in its initial stage, case property (2gm gold and Rs.1,05,000) remains unrecovered, and there is a risk of the accused repeating offences or tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case