SI of Kandili PS vs Subalakshmi Advocate - SENGUTTAVAN C T — 717/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTU020014602026
Filing Number
1458/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
717/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
482
Police Station
KANDILI POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of Kandili PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Subalakshmi Advocate - SENGUTTAVAN C T
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court ordered the return of the seized Honda Activa scooter (TN 83W 1271) to the petitioner Subalakshmi, finding her as the rightful owner and noting that prolonged detention would cause mechanical damage and depreciation to the vehicle. The court granted the return subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 60,000 bond with surety, undertaking not to alter the vehicle, producing it when required by court, and obtaining panchanama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
-
05-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
-
03-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
-
26-Feb-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
-
25-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 717/2026
The Judicial Magistrate Court ordered the return of the seized Honda Activa scooter (TN 83W 1271) to the petitioner Subalakshmi, finding her as the rightful owner and noting that prolonged detention would cause mechanical damage and depreciation to the vehicle. The court granted the return subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 60,000 bond with surety, undertaking not to alter the vehicle, producing it when required by court, and obtaining panchanama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts