SI OF POLICE NATRAMPALLI POLICE STATION vs RAMAKRISHNAN Advocate - TAMIL SELVAN N — 700057/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii) IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020008992018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7000366/2018
Filing Date
19-06-2018
Registration No
700057/2018
Registration Date
19-06-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
NATRAMPALLI POLICE STATION
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE NATRAMPALLI POLICE STATION
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
RAMAKRISHNAN Advocate - TAMIL SELVAN N
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirupathur acquitted the accused Ramakrishnan of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2) (indecent language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that key prosecution witnesses either failed to appear for examination or their testimonies contradicted the government's case, and the sole victim-witness was not examined, making it impossible to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirupathur acquitted the accused Ramakrishnan of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2) (indecent language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that key prosecution witnesses either failed to appear for examination or their testimonies contradicted the government's case, and the sole victim-witness was not examined, making it impossible to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts