SI OF POLICE NATRAMPALLI POLICE STATION vs RAMASAMY Advocate - ARIVUSUDAR A — 700056/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(i)IPC. Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 20th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020008982018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7000365/2018
Filing Date
19-06-2018
Registration No
700056/2018
Registration Date
19-06-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court
FIR Details
FIR Number
340
Police Station
NATRAMPALLI POLICE STATION
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE NATRAMPALLI POLICE STATION
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
RAMASAMY Advocate - ARIVUSUDAR A
NAGARAJ
Adv. SALAPPAN
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Disposed
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed complaints filed under Section 54, Clause 9 of the 1969 Act against multiple accused individuals. The court found the complainants' testimonies inconsistent and lacking credibility, with significant contradictions regarding timings, locations, and details of the alleged incidents. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed complaints filed under Section 54, Clause 9 of the 1969 Act against multiple accused individuals. The court found the complainants' testimonies inconsistent and lacking credibility, with significant contradictions regarding timings, locations, and details of the alleged incidents. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts