SI OF POLICE NATRAMPALLI vs VIGNESH Advocate - BALAMANAVALAN P — 24/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(2). Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020005042022
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
503/2022
Filing Date
11-02-2022
Registration No
24/2022
Registration Date
11-02-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE NATRAMPALLI
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
VIGNESH Advocate - BALAMANAVALAN P
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thirupathur
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant | |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 13-02-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (Judicial Form No. 53) recorded on April 15, 2025, before the Judicial Magistrate Court III, Tirupathur in Case CC No. 24/2022. The prosecution's third witness testified about an assault incident where his father was allegedly attacked with a stone by the accused approximately 4 years ago, resulting in head injuries requiring hospitalization. The witness's cross-examination was completed without the defense counsel, and the deposition was recorded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (Judicial Form No. 53) recorded on April 15, 2025, before the Judicial Magistrate Court III, Tirupathur in Case CC No. 24/2022. The prosecution's third witness testified about an assault incident where his father was allegedly attacked with a stone by the accused approximately 4 years ago, resulting in head injuries requiring hospitalization. The witness's cross-examination was completed without the defense counsel, and the deposition was recorded accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts