SI OF POLICE ALANGAYAM PS vs ELUMALAI — 33/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 379,511. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020004802026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
479/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2024
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE ALANGAYAM PS (Police Station)
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
ELUMALAI
Prakasam
Selvam
Suresh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur
Disposed
Evidence
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 25-02-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 20-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tirupathur acquitted all four accused (A1-A4) of charges under IPC sections 379 (theft) and 511 (attempt to commit an offence), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant could not identify the accused, key eyewitnesses forgot the incident, the stolen Vinayagar statue was never produced in court, and witnesses to the confession statement disowned their involvement, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tirupathur acquitted all four accused (A1-A4) of charges under IPC sections 379 (theft) and 511 (attempt to commit an offence), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant could not identify the accused, key eyewitnesses forgot the incident, the stolen Vinayagar statue was never produced in court, and witnesses to the confession statement disowned their involvement, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts