SI OF POLICE ALANGAYAM PS vs ELUMALAI — 33/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 379,511. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTU020004802026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

479/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2024

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 379,511

Petitioner(s)

SI OF POLICE ALANGAYAM PS (Police Station)

Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

ELUMALAI

Prakasam

Selvam

Suresh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Evidence

06-03-2026

Issue of Service

25-02-2026

Issue of Service

20-02-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tirupathur acquitted all four accused (A1-A4) of charges under IPC sections 379 (theft) and 511 (attempt to commit an offence), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant could not identify the accused, key eyewitnesses forgot the incident, the stolen Vinayagar statue was never produced in court, and witnesses to the confession statement disowned their involvement, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tirupathur acquitted all four accused (A1-A4) of charges under IPC sections 379 (theft) and 511 (attempt to commit an offence), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the complainant could not identify the accused, key eyewitnesses forgot the incident, the stolen Vinayagar statue was never produced in court, and witnesses to the confession statement disowned their involvement, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case