S.I. OF POLICE, KURUSILPATTU P.S. vs MANI AND OTHERS — 600016/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),324,326. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020003282018
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
600131/2018
Filing Date
16-02-2018
Registration No
600016/2018
Registration Date
16-02-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I. OF POLICE, KURUSILPATTU P.S.
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
MANI AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 23-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 06-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this case (C.C. No. 16/2018) from Tiruppattur Court, Tamil Nadu, dated December 27, 2023, the witness Velu @ Vaikanthiран (age 37), a farmer from Andiappanur, testified regarding a dispute over operating a tractor on disputed land. The witness stated he was hired approximately seven years earlier to operate a tractor on land but was stopped by the first respondent, leading to a confrontation. The court recorded the witness's testimony under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and he was cross-examined by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this case (C.C. No. 16/2018) from Tiruppattur Court, Tamil Nadu, dated December 27, 2023, the witness Velu @ Vaikanthiран (age 37), a farmer from Andiappanur, testified regarding a dispute over operating a tractor on disputed land. The witness stated he was hired approximately seven years earlier to operate a tractor on land but was stopped by the first respondent, leading to a confrontation. The court recorded the witness's testimony under Section 54(9) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and he was cross-examined by the opposing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts