SI OF POLICE JOLARPET PS vs ABDHULLAH BASHA — 11/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457 380. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 27th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020002912023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
291/2023
Filing Date
06-01-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
06-01-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
FIR Details
FIR Number
183
Police Station
JOLARPET POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE JOLARPET PS (Police Station)
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
ABDHULLAH BASHA
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate I, Tirupathur found Abdullah Basha guilty under IPC sections 457 (house breaking) and 380 (theft) for breaking into a residence on 30.06.2022 and stealing approximately 8 sovereigns of gold jewelry valued at Rs. 1,50,000. The court relied primarily on the accused's voluntary confession statement recorded by police witnesses and recovery of the stolen jewelry from an ABS service center, since there were no eyewitnesses to the actual crime. The court sentenced the accused to three years simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000 under each section, with sentences running concurrently, after rejecting the Probation of Offenders Act benefits due to the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate I, Tirupathur found Abdullah Basha guilty under IPC sections 457 (house breaking) and 380 (theft) for breaking into a residence on 30.06.2022 and stealing approximately 8 sovereigns of gold jewelry valued at Rs. 1,50,000. The court relied primarily on the accused's voluntary confession statement recorded by police witnesses and recovery of the stolen jewelry from an ABS service center, since there were no eyewitnesses to the actual crime. The court sentenced the accused to three years simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000 under each section, with sentences running concurrently, after rejecting the Probation of Offenders Act benefits due to the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts