Deputy director vs C S Irshad Ahmed — 5/2026
Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section Section 41 with Rule 61 E. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 18th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020001322026
e-Filing Number
11-10-2025
Filing Number
131/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deputy director
Adv. N.Umabharathy
Respondent(s)
-
1.C S Irshad Ahmed
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirupathur convicted C.S. Irshad Ahmed, Manager of Rumana Leathers Company, for violating Section 41 Rule 61E of the Factories Act 1948 by failing to maintain machinery safety equipment (PLCB controls and automatic mechanical locks) at his factory during a surprise inspection on 02.07.2025. The accused pleaded guilty and the court imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000 with one month imprisonment as default penalty, taking a lenient view given the circumstances and settlement with injured workers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur
-
04-Feb-2026
For further Proceedings
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirupathur convicted C.S. Irshad Ahmed, Manager of Rumana Leathers Company, for violating Section 41 Rule 61E of the Factories Act 1948 by failing to maintain machinery safety equipment (PLCB controls and automatic mechanical locks) at his factory during a surprise inspection on 02.07.2025. The accused pleaded guilty and the court imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000 with one month imprisonment as default penalty, taking a lenient view given the circumstances and settlement with injured workers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts