THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUPATTUR TAUK PS vs KUNICHI GOVINDASAMY Advocate - GOVINDASAMY R — 9/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394,511,451,342. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTU020001022022
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
102/2022
Filing Date
10-01-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
10-01-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
FIR Details
FIR Number
335
Police Station
THIRUPATHUR TALUK
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUPATTUR TAUK PS (Police Station)
Adv. ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
KUNICHI GOVINDASAMY Advocate - GOVINDASAMY R
MURUGAN
Adv. GOVINDASAMY R
SILAMBARASAN
Adv. GOVINDASAMY R
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 03-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a case from the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Tiruppattur, involving a criminal complaint (C.C. No. 9/2022). The complainant, a housewife, testified that on 09.09.2021, three unidentified persons forcibly entered her home, attacked her and her daughter with pepper spray and a knife, threatened them for valuables, and fled when neighbors intervened. The court has adjourned the first hearing as the second accused (Murugan) was absent, and proceeded to record evidence from the present accused (Defendants 1 and 3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a case from the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Tiruppattur, involving a criminal complaint (C.C. No. 9/2022). The complainant, a housewife, testified that on 09.09.2021, three unidentified persons forcibly entered her home, attacked her and her daughter with pepper spray and a knife, threatened them for valuables, and fled when neighbors intervened. The court has adjourned the first hearing as the second accused (Murugan) was absent, and proceeded to record evidence from the present accused (Defendants 1 and 3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts