VENGATESWARA R vs BALAJI P — 3/2020

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTU020000362020

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

36/2020

Filing Date

03-01-2020

Registration No

3/2020

Registration Date

03-01-2020

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,142
MP/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section BALAJI PVENGATESWARA R
MP/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section VENGATESWARA RBALAJI P
MP/4/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section VENGATESWARA RBALAJI P
MP/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section BALAJI PVENGATESWARA R
MP/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section BALAJI PVENGATESWARA R
MP/7/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section VENGATESWARA RBALAJI P
MP/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section BALAJI PVENGATESWARA R
MP/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section BALAJI PVENGATESWARA R
MP/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section BALAJI PVENGATESWARA R

Petitioner(s)

VENGATESWARA R

Adv. SAKTHI A

Respondent(s)

BALAJI P

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thirupathur

21-04-2026

Evidence

27-03-2026

Evidence

17-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

The cross-examination of witness PW-01 has been completed with no re-examination. The court finds the defendant's testimony regarding money transactions and alleged receipt of Rs. 2 lakhs lacks credible documentary evidence, and his claims are contradicted by the circumstances. The case is disposed of as per the court's findings on the merits of the dispute concerning the money transaction dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The cross-examination of witness PW-01 has been completed with no re-examination. The court finds the defendant's testimony regarding money transactions and alleged receipt of Rs. 2 lakhs lacks credible documentary evidence, and his claims are contradicted by the circumstances. The case is disposed of as per the court's findings on the merits of the dispute concerning the money transaction dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case