SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUTHIAMPUTHUR STATION vs Pothinarayanan — 234/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296 (b),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTT170021602025
e-Filing Number
26-08-2025
Filing Number
2110/2025
Filing Date
01-Sep-2025
Registration No
234/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Ottapidaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
Puthiyamputhur P.S.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUTHIAMPUTHUR STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pothinarayanan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: CC 234/2025 Sub Inspector of Police Puthiamputhur Station v. Pothinarayanan This is a witness deposition (PW-5) in a criminal investigation involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(3), and the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Practices Act. The investigating officer (a forensic examiner) testified that on 21.08.2025, he visited the crime scene, prepared site documentation, and recovered a purple-handled silver scissor from a garbage bag based on witness testimony. After the accused failed to appear when summoned under section 35(2) BNSS, he was arrested the same day and produced before the magistrate. The investigator completed his inquiry and filed the final charge sheet on 25.08.2025. The defense cross-examination challenged procedural aspects including witness credibility, timeline inconsistencies, and the investigative methodology, but the court ultimately found the accusations substantiated based on witness statements and evidence collected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 234/2025
Case Summary: CC 234/2025 Sub Inspector of Police Puthiamputhur Station v. Pothinarayanan This is a witness deposition (PW-5) in a criminal investigation involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 351(3), and the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Harmful Practices Act. The investigating officer (a forensic examiner) testified that on 21.08.2025, he visited the crime scene, prepared site documentation, and recovered a purple-handled silver scissor from a garbage bag based on witness testimony. After the accused failed to appear when summoned under section 35(2) BNSS, he was arrested the same day and produced before the magistrate. The investigator completed his inquiry and filed the final charge sheet on 25.08.2025. The defense cross-examination challenged procedural aspects including witness credibility, timeline inconsistencies, and the investigative methodology, but the court ultimately found the accusations substantiated based on witness statements and evidence collected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts