Abhraham Dhanaraj vs Rathina Mala — 72/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTT080000782024
Filing Number
78/2024
Filing Date
05-Jun-2024
Registration No
72/2024
Registration Date
15-Jul-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Srivaikuntam
Judge
1-District Munsif
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abhraham Dhanaraj
Adv. G. Rajan Subhasis
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rathina Mala
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
17-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
16-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case 72/2024 Summary In this property dispute before the District Munsiff Court, Srivaikom (dated June 16, 2026), petitioner Abhraham Dhanaraj provided cross-examination testimony regarding inheritance of ancestral property. The petitioner testified about property division among heirs following his father Balraj's death, disputing respondent Rathina Mala's claims regarding a second plot of land and asserting that all family members, not just the respondent, cared for their mother. The court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, acknowledging his testimony as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
01-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
01-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
19-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
26-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
01-Aug-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
19-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Munsif
-
11-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Munsif
-
02-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Jul-2025
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
02-Jul-2025
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
11-Jun-2025
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
21-Apr-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
05-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
17-Feb-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
03-Feb-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
01-Feb-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
13-Jan-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
14-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
14-Nov-2024
Batta
District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2024
Batta
District Munsif
-
19-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2024
Case 72/2024 Summary In this property dispute before the District Munsiff Court, Srivaikom (dated June 16, 2026), petitioner Abhraham Dhanaraj provided cross-examination testimony regarding inheritance of ancestral property. The petitioner testified about property division among heirs following his father Balraj's death, disputing respondent Rathina Mala's claims regarding a second plot of land and asserting that all family members, not just the respondent, cared for their mother. The court recorded the petitioner's sworn statement under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, acknowledging his testimony as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts