Syead Ali Fathima vs Abdul Kadhar — 66/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed without cost on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTT080000722024

Filing Number

72/2024

Filing Date

04-Jul-2024

Registration No

66/2024

Registration Date

04-Jul-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Srivaikuntam

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Syead Ali Fathima

    Adv. D. Venkadachalaphathy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Kadhar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    Case Summary: 66/2024 The District Family Court at Srivaicundam allowed petitioner Syead Ali Fathima's challenge to the validity of a Muslim divorce (Khula) granted on 11.09.2023 by the Qazi. The court upheld the Khula as legally valid, confirming the dissolution of the marriage solemnized between the petitioner and respondent Abdul Kadhar on 28.12.2011 in accordance with Muslim law. The case value was ₹5,000 with court fee of ₹150. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  15. 03-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 08-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  17. 08-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 24-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  19. 25-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 28-Aug-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif

  21. 13-Aug-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif

  22. 24-Jul-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif

  23. 01-Jul-2025

    Await Notice

    District Munsif

  24. 01-Jul-2025

    Await Notice

    District Munsif

  25. 10-Jun-2025

    Batta

    District Munsif

  26. 16-Apr-2025

    Batta

    District Munsif

  27. 27-Feb-2025

    Await Reports

    District Munsif

  28. 04-Jan-2025

    Batta

    District Munsif

  29. 19-Dec-2024

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  30. 12-Dec-2024

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  31. 04-Nov-2024

    Batta

    District Munsif

  32. 23-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  33. 09-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  34. 10-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  35. 05-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif

  36. 04-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 04-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 66/2024 The District Family Court at Srivaicundam allowed petitioner Syead Ali Fathima's challenge to the validity of a Muslim divorce (Khula) granted on 11.09.2023 by the Qazi. The court upheld the Khula as legally valid, confirming the dissolution of the marriage solemnized between the petitioner and respondent Abdul Kadhar on 28.12.2011 in accordance with Muslim law. The case value was ₹5,000 with court fee of ₹150. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case