Marikannan alias Thevendhiran vs Inspector of Police, kovilpatti West P.S — 1451/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTT010021292026

Filing Number

1861/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1451/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thoothukudi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

Kovilpatti West P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),296(b),76,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Marikannan alias Thevendhiran

    Adv. Ganesan.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, kovilpatti West P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 1451/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi dismissed Marikannan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS. Marikannan was arrested on 11.03.2026 for allegedly abusing a widow (close relative) with filthy language, outraging her modesty, wrongfully restraining her, and threatening her in public. The court denied bail, citing the serious nature of offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 76, and 351(3), the recent occurrence, incomplete investigation, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1451/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1451/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi dismissed Marikannan's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS. Marikannan was arrested on 11.03.2026 for allegedly abusing a widow (close relative) with filthy language, outraging her modesty, wrongfully restraining her, and threatening her in public. The court denied bail, citing the serious nature of offences under BNS sections 126(2), 296(b), 76, and 351(3), the recent occurrence, incomplete investigation, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case