Harish vs Sub Inspector of Police, North P.S Thoothukudi — 1385/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTT010020272026

Filing Number

1770/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1385/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thoothukudi

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

Thoothukudi North P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),140(4), 296(b), 351(3)
Tn Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, 2003 Section 3, 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harish

    Adv. Raja Sudalai.R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police, North P.S Thoothukudi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 1385/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi allowed Harish's petition to relax the anticipatory bail condition requiring daily police station sign-in at 10:00 a.m. The petitioner had complied from February 23, 2026, but faced hardship after his father's death on March 5, 2026, and as a final-year law student. The Public Prosecutor did not oppose relaxation, and the court found the petitioner's compliance and circumstances justified total removal of the reporting condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1385/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi allowed Harish's petition to relax the anticipatory bail condition requiring daily police station sign-in at 10:00 a.m. The petitioner had complied from February 23, 2026, but faced hardship after his father's death on March 5, 2026, and as a final-year law student. The Public Prosecutor did not oppose relaxation, and the court found the petitioner's compliance and circumstances justified total removal of the reporting condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case