Velmurugan alias Pana velmurugan vs Inspector of Police, Muthiahpuram P.S — 1267/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTT010018462026
Filing Number
1606/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
1267/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thoothukudi
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
223
Police Station
Muthiahpuram P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Velmurugan alias Pana velmurugan
Adv. Bala Vinothkumar.V
-
2.Ranison
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Muthiahpuram P.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No. 1267/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Velmurugan and Renison, who were accused of wrongfully restraining a complainant, attempting extortion, criminal intimidation with a weapon, and damaging property on 02.03.2026. The court considered that the petitioners had been in judicial custody for 36 days and co-accused were already granted bail. Bail was granted subject to conditions including Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, Rs.500 cash security deposit, and daily police station reporting at 10:00 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1267/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.P.No. 1267/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Velmurugan and Renison, who were accused of wrongfully restraining a complainant, attempting extortion, criminal intimidation with a weapon, and damaging property on 02.03.2026. The court considered that the petitioners had been in judicial custody for 36 days and co-accused were already granted bail. Bail was granted subject to conditions including Rs.10,000 bonds with sureties, Rs.500 cash security deposit, and daily police station reporting at 10:00 A.M. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts