SakkilaBeevi vs Government of Tamil nadu through its Thasildatar, Advocate - Mr.GP — 42/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(C). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS110197312022

Filing Number

153/2022

Filing Date

09-Dec-2022

Registration No

42/2023

Registration Date

25-Jul-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Shengottah

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SakkilaBeevi

    Adv. MR.K.ESAKKIDURAI

  2. 2.Anwar

    Adv. Mr.K.Esakkidurai

  3. 3.Arsath

    Adv. Mr.K.Esakkidurai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Tamil nadu through its Thasildatar, Advocate - Mr.GP

  2. 2.Tamil Nadu Government through its District Collector, Tenkasi

    Adv. Mr.GP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Munsif Court partly decreed the suit, declaring that the plaintiffs (Shakeela Beevi, Anwar, and Arsath) are legal heirs of deceased Syed Masood, but NOT the sole heirs. The court found that the deceased's first wife Mydeen Beevi and their two daughters (Jesimal and Sasinal Begum) are also legal heirs under Mohammedan Law. The Tahsildar was directed to issue a legal heir certificate including all heirs, subject to plaintiffs providing particulars of the first wife and her children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  11. 03-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  14. 18-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  15. 10-Feb-2026

    Trial

  16. 01-Nov-2025

    Trial

  17. 20-Sep-2025

    Trial

  18. 02-Aug-2025

    Trial

  19. 21-Jun-2025

    Trial

  20. 14-Jun-2025

    Issues

  21. 03-Jun-2025

    Lok Adalat

  22. 20-Mar-2025

    Lok Adalat

  23. 06-Feb-2025

    Issues

  24. 05-Dec-2024

    Issues

  25. 14-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

  26. 23-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

  27. 19-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

  28. 21-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

  29. 04-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

  30. 08-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

  31. 25-Apr-2024

    Lok Adalat

  32. 03-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

  33. 09-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

  34. 24-Jan-2024

    Lok Adalat

  35. 09-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

  36. 30-Nov-2023

    Lok Adalat

  37. 09-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

  38. 31-Aug-2023

    Lok Adalat

  39. 25-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 09-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif Court partly decreed the suit, declaring that the plaintiffs (Shakeela Beevi, Anwar, and Arsath) are legal heirs of deceased Syed Masood, but NOT the sole heirs. The court found that the deceased's first wife Mydeen Beevi and their two daughters (Jesimal and Sasinal Begum) are also legal heirs under Mohammedan Law. The Tahsildar was directed to issue a legal heir certificate including all heirs, subject to plaintiffs providing particulars of the first wife and her children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case