Subramanian vs Vivekanandan Alias Ravi — 59/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7, Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS110033082025
Filing Number
99/2025
Filing Date
20-Sep-2025
Registration No
59/2025
Registration Date
20-Sep-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Shengottah
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subramanian
Adv. B.MuthulakshmiM.A.L.L.M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vivekanandan Alias Ravi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 59/2025 Subramanian v. Vivekanandan Alias Ravi The District Munsiff Court, Chengalpattu dismissed the suit for non-prosecution on 20 April 2026. Both the petitioner (Subramanian) and respondents failed to appear before the court despite being called, with no legal representation present. The suit, which sought a declaration and injunction regarding property rights in Schedule 2, along with damages and other reliefs against the respondents, was consequently dismissed due to non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Munsif
-
16-Mar-2026
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2026
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Jan-2026
Written Statement
-
12-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
-
20-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2025
Case Summary: 59/2025 Subramanian v. Vivekanandan Alias Ravi The District Munsiff Court, Chengalpattu dismissed the suit for non-prosecution on 20 April 2026. Both the petitioner (Subramanian) and respondents failed to appear before the court despite being called, with no legal representation present. The suit, which sought a declaration and injunction regarding property rights in Schedule 2, along with damages and other reliefs against the respondents, was consequently dismissed due to non-prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts