Shakira Banu vs Sukumaran — 2/2025
Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 21(2)(a). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNTS110016532025
e-Filing Number
18-06-2025
Filing Number
69/2025
Filing Date
23-Jun-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
29-Jul-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Shengottah
Judge
1-District Munsif
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shakira Banu
Adv. R STEPHEN B A B L
-
2.Syed Meeran
Adv. R STEPHEN B A B L
-
3.Ameersha
Adv. R STEPHEN B A B L
-
4.Mohideen Fathima
Adv. R STEPHEN B A B L
-
5.Yasar Arafath
Adv. R STEPHEN B A B L
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sukumaran
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
15-Jun-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
09-Jun-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
06-Jun-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
01-Jun-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: RLTOP No. 2/2025 Date: 16.04.2026 This is a property dispute case involving Shakira Banu (petitioner/witness) against Sukumaran (respondent) regarding land in survey number 13/3. The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding property ownership, sales documents, and a snack shop operated on the disputed premises. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's claims about property boundaries, the respondent's occupancy period (claiming 2020 but allegedly operating since 2002), and rental payment disputes. The court rejected several of the petitioner's contentions, including arguments that the property was not properly identified and that a verbal agreement existed. The order upholds documentary evidence (Exhibits 1 & 2) as valid proof of property rights in survey number 13/3, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to their validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
11-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
23-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
11-Feb-2026
Enquiry
-
22-Jan-2026
Enquiry
-
11-Dec-2025
Enquiry
-
19-Nov-2025
Enquiry
-
05-Nov-2025
Counter
-
08-Oct-2025
Counter
-
17-Sep-2025
Counter
-
28-Aug-2025
Counter
-
29-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2025
Case Summary: RLTOP No. 2/2025 Date: 16.04.2026 This is a property dispute case involving Shakira Banu (petitioner/witness) against Sukumaran (respondent) regarding land in survey number 13/3. The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding property ownership, sales documents, and a snack shop operated on the disputed premises. The court noted inconsistencies in the petitioner's claims about property boundaries, the respondent's occupancy period (claiming 2020 but allegedly operating since 2002), and rental payment disputes. The court rejected several of the petitioner's contentions, including arguments that the property was not properly identified and that a verbal agreement existed. The order upholds documentary evidence (Exhibits 1 & 2) as valid proof of property rights in survey number 13/3, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to their validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts