Habib Nisha vs Rahimal begam Advocate - TR.S.KRISHNAMOORTY — 69/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS110013552020
Filing Number
173/2020
Filing Date
23-Dec-2020
Registration No
69/2020
Registration Date
23-Dec-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Shengottah
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Habib Nisha
Adv. Tr.I.Mohammed Siraj
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rahimal begam Advocate - TR.S.KRISHNAMOORTY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Habib Nisha v. J. Rahimal Begam (OS 69/2020) The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit claiming joint ownership of a 70 sq.ft common passage. The court found that the disputed property was already validly conveyed to the defendant under an earlier settlement deed (2008) with clear boundaries, and a subsequent settlement deed (2010) purporting to create a common pathway could not override this prior absolute grant. The court applied the principle that a settlor cannot derogate from their own earlier conveyance and held the plaintiff abandoned her alleged right by remaining silent for a decade. The suit was barred by limitation and the plaintiff was denied declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
28-Apr-2026
Orders
District Munsif
-
24-Apr-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
20-Apr-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif
-
18-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
11-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
07-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
30-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
-
04-Dec-2025
Arguments
-
13-Nov-2025
Arguments
-
05-Nov-2025
Arguments
-
15-Oct-2025
Arguments
-
10-Sep-2025
Arguments
-
28-Aug-2025
Arguments
-
14-Aug-2025
Arguments
-
31-Jul-2025
Arguments
-
10-Jul-2025
Arguments
-
25-Jun-2025
Arguments
-
11-Jun-2025
IA Pending
-
03-Apr-2025
IA Pending
-
26-Mar-2025
IA Pending
-
27-Feb-2025
IA Pending
-
30-Jan-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
30-Jan-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
30-Jan-2025
IA Pending
-
12-Dec-2024
IA Pending
-
14-Nov-2024
Arguments
-
24-Oct-2024
Part Heard
-
26-Sep-2024
Part Heard
-
05-Sep-2024
Part Heard
-
08-Aug-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
08-Aug-2024
Arguments
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence
-
12-Jun-2024
Evidence
-
24-Apr-2024
Arguments
-
20-Mar-2024
Arguments
-
22-Feb-2024
Arguments
-
31-Jan-2024
Arguments
-
10-Jan-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jan-2024
Evidence
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
-
22-Nov-2023
Evidence
-
08-Nov-2023
Evidence
-
18-Oct-2023
Evidence
-
27-Sep-2023
Evidence
-
02-Sep-2023
Evidence
-
30-Aug-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
30-Aug-2023
Evidence
-
03-Aug-2023
Evidence
-
06-Jul-2023
Evidence
-
15-Jun-2023
Evidence
-
13-Apr-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
-
23-Mar-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
-
22-Dec-2022
Evidence
-
01-Dec-2022
Evidence
-
10-Nov-2022
Evidence
-
20-Oct-2022
Trial
-
07-Sep-2022
Trial
-
13-Jul-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
-
21-Apr-2022
Issues
-
02-Feb-2022
Issues
-
16-Dec-2021
Issues
-
17-Nov-2021
Issues
-
07-Oct-2021
Written Statement
-
09-Sep-2021
Written Statement
-
28-Jul-2021
Written Statement
-
23-Jun-2021
Written Statement
-
15-Apr-2021
Written Statement
-
11-Mar-2021
Written Statement
-
27-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2020
Case Summary: Habib Nisha v. J. Rahimal Begam (OS 69/2020) The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit claiming joint ownership of a 70 sq.ft common passage. The court found that the disputed property was already validly conveyed to the defendant under an earlier settlement deed (2008) with clear boundaries, and a subsequent settlement deed (2010) purporting to create a common pathway could not override this prior absolute grant. The court applied the principle that a settlor cannot derogate from their own earlier conveyance and held the plaintiff abandoned her alleged right by remaining silent for a decade. The suit was barred by limitation and the plaintiff was denied declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts