Habib Nisha vs Rahimal begam Advocate - TR.S.KRISHNAMOORTY — 69/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS110013552020

Filing Number

173/2020

Filing Date

23-Dec-2020

Registration No

69/2020

Registration Date

23-Dec-2020

Court

District Munsif Court, Shengottah

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)
Ia/6/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section Habib NishaRahimal begam
Ia/7/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section Rahimal begamHabib Nisha

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Habib Nisha

    Adv. Tr.I.Mohammed Siraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rahimal begam Advocate - TR.S.KRISHNAMOORTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Habib Nisha v. J. Rahimal Begam (OS 69/2020) The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit claiming joint ownership of a 70 sq.ft common passage. The court found that the disputed property was already validly conveyed to the defendant under an earlier settlement deed (2008) with clear boundaries, and a subsequent settlement deed (2010) purporting to create a common pathway could not override this prior absolute grant. The court applied the principle that a settlor cannot derogate from their own earlier conveyance and held the plaintiff abandoned her alleged right by remaining silent for a decade. The suit was barred by limitation and the plaintiff was denied declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  7. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  10. 11-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  11. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  12. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  13. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  14. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  15. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  16. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  17. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  18. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  19. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif

  20. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

  21. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

  22. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

  23. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

  24. 05-Nov-2025

    Arguments

  25. 15-Oct-2025

    Arguments

  26. 10-Sep-2025

    Arguments

  27. 28-Aug-2025

    Arguments

  28. 14-Aug-2025

    Arguments

  29. 31-Jul-2025

    Arguments

  30. 10-Jul-2025

    Arguments

  31. 25-Jun-2025

    Arguments

  32. 11-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

  33. 03-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

  34. 26-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

  35. 27-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

  36. 30-Jan-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  37. 30-Jan-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  38. 30-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

  39. 12-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

  40. 14-Nov-2024

    Arguments

  41. 24-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

  42. 26-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

  43. 05-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

  44. 08-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  45. 08-Aug-2024

    Arguments

  46. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence

  47. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence

  48. 24-Apr-2024

    Arguments

  49. 20-Mar-2024

    Arguments

  50. 22-Feb-2024

    Arguments

  51. 31-Jan-2024

    Arguments

  52. 10-Jan-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  53. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

  54. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

  55. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence

  56. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

  57. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

  58. 27-Sep-2023

    Evidence

  59. 02-Sep-2023

    Evidence

  60. 30-Aug-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  61. 30-Aug-2023

    Evidence

  62. 03-Aug-2023

    Evidence

  63. 06-Jul-2023

    Evidence

  64. 15-Jun-2023

    Evidence

  65. 13-Apr-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

  66. 23-Mar-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

  67. 22-Dec-2022

    Evidence

  68. 01-Dec-2022

    Evidence

  69. 10-Nov-2022

    Evidence

  70. 20-Oct-2022

    Trial

  71. 07-Sep-2022

    Trial

  72. 13-Jul-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

  73. 21-Apr-2022

    Issues

  74. 02-Feb-2022

    Issues

  75. 16-Dec-2021

    Issues

  76. 17-Nov-2021

    Issues

  77. 07-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

  78. 09-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

  79. 28-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

  80. 23-Jun-2021

    Written Statement

  81. 15-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

  82. 11-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

  83. 27-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 23-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Habib Nisha v. J. Rahimal Begam (OS 69/2020) The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit claiming joint ownership of a 70 sq.ft common passage. The court found that the disputed property was already validly conveyed to the defendant under an earlier settlement deed (2008) with clear boundaries, and a subsequent settlement deed (2010) purporting to create a common pathway could not override this prior absolute grant. The court applied the principle that a settlor cannot derogate from their own earlier conveyance and held the plaintiff abandoned her alleged right by remaining silent for a decade. The suit was barred by limitation and the plaintiff was denied declaration, recovery of possession, and injunction reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case