Esakki vs Lakshmi Advocate - Tr.E.Murugan — 6/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS110013522020

Filing Number

170/2020

Filing Date

23-Dec-2020

Registration No

6/2021

Registration Date

27-Jan-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Shengottah

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a)
Ia/2/2026 Classification : 151 Petition Section EsakkiLakshmi
Ia/4/2026 Classification : 151 Petition Section EsakkiLakshmi

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Esakki

    Adv. Tr.G.Selvam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lakshmi Advocate - Tr.E.Murugan

  2. 2.Palanisamy

    Adv. Tr.E.Murugan

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 6/2021 Outcome: Case dismissed. The District Court rejected petitioner Esakki's property dispute claim against respondents (Advocate Lakshmi, E. Murugan, and Palanisamy), finding the suit barred by limitation. The court noted the property deed was transferred in 2007, but the case was filed only in 2021, and the petitioner failed to provide supporting documentation like settlement receipts to substantiate claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  7. 22-Apr-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  12. 03-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  14. 25-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif

  15. 08-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

  16. 07-Jan-2026

    Steps

  17. 20-Nov-2025

    Steps

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    Steps

  19. 15-Oct-2025

    Steps

  20. 08-Sep-2025

    Steps

  21. 04-Sep-2025

    Steps

  22. 13-Aug-2025

    Steps

  23. 17-Jul-2025

    Steps

  24. 25-Jun-2025

    Steps

  25. 30-Apr-2025

    Steps

  26. 13-Mar-2025

    Await Records

  27. 19-Feb-2025

    Await Records

  28. 30-Jan-2025

    Await Records

  29. 05-Dec-2024

    Issues

  30. 10-Oct-2024

    Issues

  31. 08-Aug-2024

    Issues

  32. 12-Jun-2024

    Issues

  33. 20-Mar-2024

    Issues

  34. 11-Jan-2024

    Issues

  35. 29-Nov-2023

    Issues

  36. 19-Oct-2023

    Issues

  37. 30-Aug-2023

    Issues

  38. 15-Jun-2023

    Issues

  39. 13-Apr-2023

    Issues

  40. 02-Feb-2023

    Issues

  41. 30-Nov-2022

    Issues

  42. 19-Oct-2022

    Issues

  43. 25-Aug-2022

    Issues

  44. 30-Jun-2022

    Issues

  45. 20-Apr-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

  46. 27-Jan-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

  47. 17-Dec-2021

    Judgement

  48. 28-Oct-2021

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  49. 28-Oct-2021

    Judgement

  50. 08-Sep-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  51. 12-Aug-2021

    Written Statement

  52. 01-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

  53. 22-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

  54. 03-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

  55. 27-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 23-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 6/2021 Outcome: Case dismissed. The District Court rejected petitioner Esakki's property dispute claim against respondents (Advocate Lakshmi, E. Murugan, and Palanisamy), finding the suit barred by limitation. The court noted the property deed was transferred in 2007, but the case was filed only in 2021, and the petitioner failed to provide supporting documentation like settlement receipts to substantiate claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case