Ramaraj vs Ramachandran Advocate - Tr.S.Murugan — 63/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),40. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS110009522020

Filing Number

151/2020

Filing Date

26-Nov-2020

Registration No

63/2020

Registration Date

26-Nov-2020

Court

District Munsif Court, Shengottah

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),40

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramaraj

    Adv. Tr.K.Rajmahendran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramachandran Advocate - Tr.S.Murugan

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 63/2020 (Ramaraj v. Ramachandran Advocate) The court hearing on 08.06.2026 marked a continuation of trial in this Original Suit. Multiple documents were marked as exhibits including land deeds, property documents, and a USB flash drive (marked as exhibit 6). The defendant objected to the USB evidence, claiming it lacked audio content and was case-created; the court overruled this objection. Based on Supreme Court precedent (Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushan Rao), the court admitted exhibit 6, holding that Section 65(B) certificates can be filed at any stage. Cross-examination of the defendant's counsel was deferred to another date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  8. 24-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  9. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 18-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  11. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    District Munsif

  12. 23-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  15. 14-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  16. 10-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif

  17. 07-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  18. 04-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  19. 23-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  20. 20-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  21. 19-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  22. 07-Feb-2026

    Issues

  23. 21-Jan-2026

    Issues

  24. 17-Dec-2025

    Issues

  25. 15-Nov-2025

    Issues

  26. 23-Oct-2025

    Issues

  27. 24-Sep-2025

    Issues

  28. 30-Jul-2025

    Issues

  29. 09-Jul-2025

    Appearance

  30. 17-Apr-2025

    Appearance

  31. 30-Jan-2025

    Appearance

  32. 05-Dec-2024

    Issues

  33. 23-Oct-2024

    Issues

  34. 29-Aug-2024

    Issues

  35. 04-Jul-2024

    Issues

  36. 17-Apr-2024

    Issues

  37. 06-Mar-2024

    Issues

  38. 04-Jan-2024

    Issues

  39. 23-Nov-2023

    Issues

  40. 20-Sep-2023

    Issues

  41. 10-Aug-2023

    Issues

  42. 28-Jun-2023

    Issues

  43. 13-Apr-2023

    Issues

  44. 09-Feb-2023

    Issues

  45. 30-Nov-2022

    Issues

  46. 19-Oct-2022

    Issues

  47. 25-Aug-2022

    Issues

  48. 30-Jun-2022

    Issues

  49. 20-Apr-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  50. 06-Apr-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  51. 17-Mar-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  52. 23-Feb-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  53. 08-Dec-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  54. 07-Oct-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  55. 09-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

  56. 19-Aug-2021

    Written Statement

  57. 22-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

  58. 28-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

  59. 24-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

  60. 10-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

  61. 23-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 26-Nov-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 63/2020 (Ramaraj v. Ramachandran Advocate) The court hearing on 08.06.2026 marked a continuation of trial in this Original Suit. Multiple documents were marked as exhibits including land deeds, property documents, and a USB flash drive (marked as exhibit 6). The defendant objected to the USB evidence, claiming it lacked audio content and was case-created; the court overruled this objection. Based on Supreme Court precedent (Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushan Rao), the court admitted exhibit 6, holding that Section 65(B) certificates can be filed at any stage. Cross-examination of the defendant's counsel was deferred to another date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case