Pathumuthu Saral vs Chaiyathu Masood — 8/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 Rule 1 CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS110004032026
Filing Number
9/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
District Munsif Court, Shengottah
Judge
1-District Munsif
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pathumuthu Saral
Adv. Thiru. M. Mukamathu Salim B.A. B.L.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chaiyathu Masood
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The District Munsif Court in Shencottai decreed that the Islamic marriage between Pathumuthu Saral and Seyed Masood, solemnized on 21.01.1985, stands dissolved by virtue of the plaintiff's valid exercise of Khula (unilateral divorce right) on 12.01.2026. The court held that Khula validity does not depend on the husband's consent once the wife clearly manifests her intent to terminate the marriage, relying on Quranic principles affirming women's autonomous right to dissolve marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
05-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
The District Munsif Court in Shencottai decreed that the Islamic marriage between Pathumuthu Saral and Seyed Masood, solemnized on 21.01.1985, stands dissolved by virtue of the plaintiff's valid exercise of Khula (unilateral divorce right) on 12.01.2026. The court held that Khula validity does not depend on the husband's consent once the wife clearly manifests her intent to terminate the marriage, relying on Quranic principles affirming women's autonomous right to dissolve marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts