Palraj vs Ramar — 11/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS110002342025

Filing Number

21/2025

Filing Date

27-Jan-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

01-Feb-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Shengottah

Judge

1-District Munsif

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Palraj

    Adv. Tr.S.Ganeshan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 11/2025 Summary: Palraj v. Ramar The District Munsif of Shencottai decreed the suit in favor of Palraj, holding that Ramar must repay Rs. 80,000 loaned on 09.08.2023 per a valid promissory note, plus 6% per annum interest from suit date till realization. The court found the promissory note satisfied Negotiable Instruments Act Section 4 requirements, the plaintiff's oral testimony corroborated documentary evidence, statutory presumptions under Section 118 arose unrebutted, and Ramar's default after legal notice (06.12.2024) warranted recovery—though the court reduced interest from claimed 12% to 6% per annum as just and reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  11. 23-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  14. 21-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  16. 18-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

  18. 01-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 27-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 11/2025 Summary: Palraj v. Ramar The District Munsif of Shencottai decreed the suit in favor of Palraj, holding that Ramar must repay Rs. 80,000 loaned on 09.08.2023 per a valid promissory note, plus 6% per annum interest from suit date till realization. The court found the promissory note satisfied Negotiable Instruments Act Section 4 requirements, the plaintiff's oral testimony corroborated documentary evidence, statutory presumptions under Section 118 arose unrebutted, and Ramar's default after legal notice (06.12.2024) warranted recovery—though the court reduced interest from claimed 12% to 6% per annum as just and reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case