SI of Police Sankarankovil Town P.S vs Sathiyamoorthy S/o Yosuvan — 303/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),131,133,351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS090006812026

Filing Number

681/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

303/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),131,133,351(2)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police Sankarankovil Town P.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sathiyamoorthy S/o Yosuvan

  2. 2.Pitchiah S/o Thirumalai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge at Sankarnkoil granted bail to two accused persons (Sathyamurthy and Pichaiyo) in Criminal Case No. 88/2026 under BNS sections 131, 133, 296(b), and 351(2), subject to conditions including furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 each with two sureties, cooperating with investigation, and reporting to the police station for 45 days. The court found them to be cooperating witnesses with fixed residences and no flight risk, outweighing the prosecution's concerns about potential witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge at Sankarnkoil granted bail to two accused persons (Sathyamurthy and Pichaiyo) in Criminal Case No. 88/2026 under BNS sections 131, 133, 296(b), and 351(2), subject to conditions including furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 each with two sureties, cooperating with investigation, and reporting to the police station for 45 days. The court found them to be cooperating witnesses with fixed residences and no flight risk, outweighing the prosecution's concerns about potential witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case