S.I.of Police, Kuruvikulam P.S. vs Ayyadurai S/o. Velkonar — 298/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305, 331(4). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS090006482026

Filing Number

648/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

298/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305, 331(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.I.of Police, Kuruvikulam P.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ayyadurai S/o. Velkonar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional District Judge (Sankarankovil) ordered the release of ₹5,200 seized by police in a theft case (Sections 305, 331(4) BNS) to the petitioner on an interim basis. The court found that denying the petitioner access to the recovered money would cause him hardship, and accepted the government's position that there was no objection to releasing the funds conditionally. The petitioner was required to furnish a personal bond for ₹5,200, provide an ID photograph with the bond, prepare a panchnama (inventory document), and ensure the money's presence during all court proceedings before final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 298/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional District Judge (Sankarankovil) ordered the release of ₹5,200 seized by police in a theft case (Sections 305, 331(4) BNS) to the petitioner on an interim basis. The court found that denying the petitioner access to the recovered money would cause him hardship, and accepted the government's position that there was no objection to releasing the funds conditionally. The petitioner was required to furnish a personal bond for ₹5,200, provide an ID photograph with the bond, prepare a panchnama (inventory document), and ensure the money's presence during all court proceedings before final disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case