S.I.of Police, Thiruvengadam P.S. vs Gurusamy S/o. Ayyanan — 283/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTS090006052026

Filing Number

605/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

283/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123
Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.I.of Police, Thiruvengadam P.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gurusamy S/o. Ayyanan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge granted the petitioner's request to temporarily release his seized TVS XL 100 Heavy Duty two-wheeler (TN 79 H 4285) from police custody, finding that he had legitimate ownership documents and that the vehicle was essential for his agricultural livelihood. The court imposed six conditions including a bail bond of ₹65,000, deposit of the original RC book, prohibition on selling or modifying the vehicle, production during proceedings, and submission of photographs and undertakings regarding COTPA Act compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 283/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge granted the petitioner's request to temporarily release his seized TVS XL 100 Heavy Duty two-wheeler (TN 79 H 4285) from police custody, finding that he had legitimate ownership documents and that the vehicle was essential for his agricultural livelihood. The court imposed six conditions including a bail bond of ₹65,000, deposit of the original RC book, prohibition on selling or modifying the vehicle, production during proceedings, and submission of photographs and undertakings regarding COTPA Act compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case