SI of Police K.V.Nallur P.S vs Ganasekar S/o Inbaraj — 256/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTS090005302026
Filing Number
530/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
256/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of Police K.V.Nallur P.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganasekar S/o Inbaraj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Additional District Judge of Sankarankovil granted a petition (Cr.M.P. No. 256/2026) to release an OLA electric two-wheeler (Chassis No. P53BUDCB8EJA06030, Engine No. M2PH1025J50026) to the petitioner on an interim basis, finding that the vehicle owner's identity matched police records and that prolonged judicial custody would damage the vehicle. The court imposed six conditions including a ₹60,000 bond, deposit of original RC book, prohibition on sale or modification, regular court production, photographic documentation, and preparation of a panchanama statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 256/2026
Summary The Additional District Judge of Sankarankovil granted a petition (Cr.M.P. No. 256/2026) to release an OLA electric two-wheeler (Chassis No. P53BUDCB8EJA06030, Engine No. M2PH1025J50026) to the petitioner on an interim basis, finding that the vehicle owner's identity matched police records and that prolonged judicial custody would damage the vehicle. The court imposed six conditions including a ₹60,000 bond, deposit of original RC book, prohibition on sale or modification, regular court production, photographic documentation, and preparation of a panchanama statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts