SI of Police, KV Nallur PS vs Anand and another Advocate - RAMKUMAR — 281/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,506(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-Mar-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTS080007182024

Filing Number

295/2024

Filing Date

14-Sep-2015

Registration No

281/2024

Registration Date

14-Sep-2015

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police, KV Nallur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anand and another Advocate - RAMKUMAR

Case History

  1. 12-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  8. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    PW 3 (Balakrishnan) was examined in case CC 281/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil on 7th November 2025. The witness testified regarding a police inspection visit on 06.08.2015 and confirmed his signature on the inspection document marked as A.Sa.A.1, though he retracted parts of his earlier statement regarding involvement with the defendant. Cross-examination by the prosecution was permitted, and the deposition concluded with no cross-examination from the defence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  18. 23-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  20. 16-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  21. 25-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  22. 04-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  23. 14-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  24. 31-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  25. 19-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  26. 11-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  27. 21-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  28. 12-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  29. 26-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  30. 13-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  31. 05-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  32. 19-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  33. 17-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  34. 31-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  35. 23-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  36. 11-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  37. 29-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 14-Sep-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2024

casestatus.in Summary

PW 3 (Balakrishnan) was examined in case CC 281/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil on 7th November 2025. The witness testified regarding a police inspection visit on 06.08.2015 and confirmed his signature on the inspection document marked as A.Sa.A.1, though he retracted parts of his earlier statement regarding involvement with the defendant. Cross-examination by the prosecution was permitted, and the deposition concluded with no cross-examination from the defence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case