SI of Police vs Ravi @ Karthikumar Advocate - S.Karuppasamy — 238/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTS080005942024

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

Filing Number

248/2024

Filing Date

17-12-2014

Registration No

238/2024

Registration Date

17-12-2014

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravi @ Karthikumar
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravi @ KarthikumarSNKL Town PS
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravi @ KarthikumarSI of Police, SNKL Town PS
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravi @ KarthikumarSI of Police SNKL Town PS
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Ravi @ KarthikumarSI of Police SNKL Town PS

Petitioner(s)

SI of Police

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ravi @ Karthikumar Advocate - S.Karuppasamy

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif

05-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

22-01-2026

Evidence

03-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

19-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

PW 7 (a police officer) testified on 19.02.2026 in case CC 238/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil, regarding his involvement in arresting the accused on 27.11.2012 when brass lamps were recovered from a plastic bag. The cross-examination revealed discrepancies regarding whether written authorization was provided for the patrol duty and whether proper documentation was maintained in the police records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

PW 7 (a police officer) testified on 19.02.2026 in case CC 238/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil, regarding his involvement in arresting the accused on 27.11.2012 when brass lamps were recovered from a plastic bag. The cross-examination revealed discrepancies regarding whether written authorization was provided for the patrol duty and whether proper documentation was maintained in the police records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case