SI of Police, Sankarankovil AWPS vs Arun Amalin and 4 others Advocate - PUSHPARAJ S — 170/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),294(b),406,506(i). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTS080004522024
Filing Number
178/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2017
Registration No
170/2024
Registration Date
23-01-2017
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police, Sankarankovil AWPS
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Arun Amalin and 4 others Advocate - PUSHPARAJ S
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Judgement
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 19-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Munsif/Judicial Magistrate of Sankarankovil acquitted all five accused persons (A1-A5) of charges under IPC sections 498A, 294(b), 406, 506(1), the TNPHW Act, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove allegations of dowry demands, harassment, threats, obscene language, and criminal breach of trust beyond reasonable doubt due to material discrepancies, contradictions in witness testimonies, and lack of documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Munsif/Judicial Magistrate of Sankarankovil acquitted all five accused persons (A1-A5) of charges under IPC sections 498A, 294(b), 406, 506(1), the TNPHW Act, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove allegations of dowry demands, harassment, threats, obscene language, and criminal breach of trust beyond reasonable doubt due to material discrepancies, contradictions in witness testimonies, and lack of documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts