MALLIGA vs MUTHUPANDIAN (Died) — 180/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2). Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS080002302022
Filing Number
248/2022
Filing Date
04-Jul-2022
Registration No
180/2022
Registration Date
21-Jul-2022
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MALLIGA
Adv. EUGENE.F.X
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUTHUPANDIAN (Died)
-
2.Parameshwari
Adv. EXPARTE
-
3.Muvya
Adv. EXPARTE
-
4.Jegadeesh
Adv. EXPARTE
-
5.jebamani
Adv. EXPARTE
-
6.Sathiskumar
Adv. EXPARTE
-
7.JeiMurali
Adv. EXPARTE
Case History
-
02-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
19-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Oct-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Aug-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court allowed three interim applications (I.A. Nos. 06/2025, 07/2025, and 08/2025) filed in Original Suit No. 180/2022. The District Court condoned a 429-day delay in adding the heirs of the deceased plaintiff (respondents 2-5) as parties to the case under CPC Order 22 Rule 9 and Rule 3 (Section 151), and permitted them to be impleaded as plaintiffs in the original suit. The court found that adding the legal heirs as replacement parties was necessary for complete adjudication of the case, notwithstanding the delay in filing the substitution application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Aug-2025
Amendment
Principal District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Jun-2025
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2025
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2025
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
17-Feb-2025
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
13-Dec-2024
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2024
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Oct-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
19-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
12-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Sep-2023
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
09-Aug-2023
Amendment
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2023
Amendment
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Jun-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
02-Jun-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Apr-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2023
Batta
Principal District Munsif
-
30-Mar-2023
Batta
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Jan-2023
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
22-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
Principal District Munsif
-
15-Dec-2022
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
25-Nov-2022
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
16-Nov-2022
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2022
Steps
Principal District Munsif
-
29-Sep-2022
Await Notice
Principal District Munsif
-
26-Aug-2022
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 180/2022
Summary The court allowed three interim applications (I.A. Nos. 06/2025, 07/2025, and 08/2025) filed in Original Suit No. 180/2022. The District Court condoned a 429-day delay in adding the heirs of the deceased plaintiff (respondents 2-5) as parties to the case under CPC Order 22 Rule 9 and Rule 3 (Section 151), and permitted them to be impleaded as plaintiffs in the original suit. The court found that adding the legal heirs as replacement parties was necessary for complete adjudication of the case, notwithstanding the delay in filing the substitution application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts