SI of Police, Chinnakovilankulam P.S vs Gomathi, W/o.Velusamy and one other Advocate - MARIDURAI. V — 64/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,325,506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTS080001552024
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
65/2024
Filing Date
20-12-2018
Registration No
64/2024
Registration Date
20-12-2018
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police, Chinnakovilankulam P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gomathi, W/o.Velusamy and one other Advocate - MARIDURAI. V
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif
Evidence
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Questioning |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document is a witness deposition (PW 9) in Case CC 64/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil, dated 26.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a criminal case registered on 08.10.2016 involving charges under IPC sections 294(B), 323, 506(1), and the Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, Section 4. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged on discrepancies including date inconsistencies (08.10.2016 vs 01.10.2016 vs 07.06.2016 and 07.09.2016), conflicting information about the number of assailants, and failure to examine certain key officials, leading to findings that the witness testimony was one-sided and incomplete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document is a witness deposition (PW 9) in Case CC 64/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil, dated 26.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a criminal case registered on 08.10.2016 involving charges under IPC sections 294(B), 323, 506(1), and the Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, Section 4. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged on discrepancies including date inconsistencies (08.10.2016 vs 01.10.2016 vs 07.06.2016 and 07.09.2016), conflicting information about the number of assailants, and failure to examine certain key officials, leading to findings that the witness testimony was one-sided and incomplete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts