CHINNAMUTHU AND ANOTHER IN REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY vs STATE ITS TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - GP — 200012/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),25(a),27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS080001532017

Trial

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

Filing Number

153/2017

Filing Date

09-01-2017

Registration No

200012/2017

Registration Date

09-01-2017

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),25(a),27(c)
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Restoration Petition Section CHINNAMUTHU AND ANOTHER IN REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITYSTATE ITS TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner(s)

CHINNAMUTHU AND ANOTHER IN REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY

Adv. SUBBIAH.R.S

Respondent(s)

STATE ITS TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - GP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif

05-03-2026

Trial

05-03-2026

Restored

05-03-2026

Trial

24-04-2024

Disposed

17-04-2024

Trial

Interim Orders

24-04-2024
Copy of Judgment

Summary: Original Suit No. 12/2017 filed by Chinnamuthu and Perumal (representatives of Adidiravidar community) against the State Government of Tamil Nadu and others seeking declaration, permanent injunction, possession, and mandatory injunction regarding disputed properties was dismissed for default on 24 April 2024. The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiffs failed to appear and commence trial despite being granted sufficient time, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Original Suit No. 12/2017 filed by Chinnamuthu and Perumal (representatives of Adidiravidar community) against the State Government of Tamil Nadu and others seeking declaration, permanent injunction, possession, and mandatory injunction regarding disputed properties was dismissed for default on 24 April 2024. The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiffs failed to appear and commence trial despite being granted sufficient time, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case