UDAIYAMMAL vs GURUSAMY KONAR Advocate - RAVISANKAR. A — 200221/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS080001522016
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
200221/2016
Filing Date
17-10-2016
Registration No
200221/2016
Registration Date
17-10-2016
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UDAIYAMMAL
Adv. MARIAPPAN. K
Veyilkandhal
Adv. MARIAPPAN. K
Kaleeswari
Adv. MARIAPPAN. K
Respondent(s)
GURUSAMY KONAR Advocate - RAVISANKAR. A
Murugeswari
Adv. RAVISANKAR.A
Ramalakshmi
Adv. RAVISANKAR.A
Mariammal
Adv. RAVISANKAR.A
Poomariammal
Adv. RAVISANKAR.A
Petchiammal
Adv. RAVISANKAR.A
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition recorded on 16.02.2026 in Original Suit No. 221/2016 before the Principal District Civil Court, Sankaran Koil. The witness, Kannan (age 45), testified that his late father Kurusamy (deceased in 2008) was a document writer and authored the will document (Exhibit P.W.S.A.2) in question. During cross-examination, the witness admitted he had not brought supporting documents like his father's credentials or death certificate, and could not verify when the will was written or independently prove the signature was his father's. The deposition concluded with cross-examination completed and no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition recorded on 16.02.2026 in Original Suit No. 221/2016 before the Principal District Civil Court, Sankaran Koil. The witness, Kannan (age 45), testified that his late father Kurusamy (deceased in 2008) was a document writer and authored the will document (Exhibit P.W.S.A.2) in question. During cross-examination, the witness admitted he had not brought supporting documents like his father's credentials or death certificate, and could not verify when the will was written or independently prove the signature was his father's. The deposition concluded with cross-examination completed and no re-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts