PARAMUAMMAL (DIED) vs KOTTAISAMY Advocate - SHUNMUGAIAH.K — 200237/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)25(d). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS080001332014
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
200237/2014
Filing Date
25-08-2014
Registration No
200237/2014
Registration Date
25-08-2014
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARAMUAMMAL (DIED)
Adv. PRADHAPRAJ. R.S.S
Swaminathan
Adv. PRADHAPRAJ. R.S.S
Gomathinayagapandiyan
Adv. PRADHAPRAJ. R.S.S
Muthukumar
Adv. PRADHAPRAJ. R.S.S
Ramaiah (Died)
Adv. PRADHAPRAJ. R.S.S
Shenbagarajan
Adv. PRADHAPRAJ. R.S.S
Respondent(s)
KOTTAISAMY Advocate - SHUNMUGAIAH.K
Muthukumar
Adv. SHUNMUGAIAH.K
Krishnasamy
Adv. SHUNMUGAIAH.K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 237/2014 dated 24.02.2026 from the Principal District Court, Sankarankoil, the cross-examination of the defendant witness was completed. The court examined documents W.A. 14 and W.A. 15 filed by the defendant in relation to property disputes, comparing them with previously filed W.A. 6. The court found the documents and their dates consistent with the case records. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the matter was noted for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 237/2014 dated 24.02.2026 from the Principal District Court, Sankarankoil, the cross-examination of the defendant witness was completed. The court examined documents W.A. 14 and W.A. 15 filed by the defendant in relation to property disputes, comparing them with previously filed W.A. 6. The court found the documents and their dates consistent with the case records. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the matter was noted for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts