SI of Police, Kuruvikulam PS vs Kadarkarai(Permanently exempted) Advocate - VELRAJ — 17/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTS080000502024

Evidence

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

Filing Number

17/2024

Filing Date

10-06-2016

Registration No

17/2024

Registration Date

10-06-2016

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii)
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KadarkaraiSI of Police, Kuruvikulam PS
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Kadarkarai(Permanently exempted)SI of Police, Kuruvikulam PS
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KadarkaraiSI of Police, Kuruvikulam PS

Petitioner(s)

SI of Police, Kuruvikulam PS (Police Station)

Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Kadarkarai(Permanently exempted) Advocate - VELRAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif

05-03-2026

Evidence

27-02-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

30-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

08-01-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a deposition of witness (PW 1) in case CC 17/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil, recorded on 8th January 2026. The witness testified that he signed a document relating to a police investigation dated 02.11.2013, but later recanted, stating he gave false evidence favoring the opposite party and is now correcting his statement. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a deposition of witness (PW 1) in case CC 17/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil, recorded on 8th January 2026. The witness testified that he signed a document relating to a police investigation dated 02.11.2013, but later recanted, stating he gave false evidence favoring the opposite party and is now correcting his statement. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposite party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case