SI of Police vs Chinnasamy @ Yonna Advocate - MARUTHURAJ V — 3/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTS080000222024

Filing Number

3/2024

Filing Date

31-Jan-2017

Registration No

3/2024

Registration Date

31-Jan-2017

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chinnasamy @ Yonna Advocate - MARUTHURAJ V

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary This document records witness depositions (PW 1 and PW 2) in case CC 3/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil on 12.02.2026. Both witnesses testified regarding a domestic violence incident from 19.04.2010 involving alleged assault with a sickle, but subsequently stated they had reached a settlement (compromise) with the accused and therefore could not provide further evidence against him. The witnesses were permitted to be declared hostile witnesses by the prosecution, and cross-examination was completed without opposition from the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  11. 26-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  14. 28-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  16. 13-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  17. 06-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  18. 24-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  19. 16-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  20. 25-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  21. 04-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  22. 21-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  23. 31-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  24. 25-Jul-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Additional District Munsif

  25. 19-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Additional District Munsif

  26. 21-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  27. 26-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  28. 21-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  29. 07-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  30. 30-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  31. 08-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  32. 19-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  33. 18-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  34. 13-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Munsif

  35. 28-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 31-Jan-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary This document records witness depositions (PW 1 and PW 2) in case CC 3/2024 before the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankovil on 12.02.2026. Both witnesses testified regarding a domestic violence incident from 19.04.2010 involving alleged assault with a sickle, but subsequently stated they had reached a settlement (compromise) with the accused and therefore could not provide further evidence against him. The witnesses were permitted to be declared hostile witnesses by the prosecution, and cross-examination was completed without opposition from the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case