CHINNADURAI vs VENKADESAN Advocate - PUSHPARAJ S — 100268/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS070007012018
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
652/2018
Filing Date
09-11-2018
Registration No
100268/2018
Registration Date
09-11-2018
Court
Sub Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHINNADURAI
Adv. KANNAN.C
Respondent(s)
VENKADESAN Advocate - PUSHPARAJ S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This court order (O.S.No.268/2018, dated 01.08.2025) from a Tamil Nadu court contains testimony from the plaintiff regarding a disputed loan amount of ₹1,70,000. The plaintiff (a lawyer) testifies about providing a cheque to the defendant, subsequent disputes over a promissory note with alleged alterations, and witness accounts regarding the transaction. The order concludes that even if the promissory note is forged, the defendant's claim should not be entirely dismissed based on the equitable circumstances presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order (O.S.No.268/2018, dated 01.08.2025) from a Tamil Nadu court contains testimony from the plaintiff regarding a disputed loan amount of ₹1,70,000. The plaintiff (a lawyer) testifies about providing a cheque to the defendant, subsequent disputes over a promissory note with alleged alterations, and witness accounts regarding the transaction. The order concludes that even if the promissory note is forged, the defendant's claim should not be entirely dismissed based on the equitable circumstances presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts