CHINNADURAI vs VENKADESAN Advocate - PUSHPARAJ S — 100268/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTS070007012018
Filing Number
652/2018
Filing Date
09-Nov-2018
Registration No
100268/2018
Registration Date
09-Nov-2018
Court
Sub Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHINNADURAI
Adv. KANNAN.C
Respondent(s)
-
1.VENKADESAN Advocate - PUSHPARAJ S
Case History
-
16-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This court order (O.S.No.268/2018, dated 01.08.2025) from a Tamil Nadu court contains testimony from the plaintiff regarding a disputed loan amount of ₹1,70,000. The plaintiff (a lawyer) testifies about providing a cheque to the defendant, subsequent disputes over a promissory note with alleged alterations, and witness accounts regarding the transaction. The order concludes that even if the promissory note is forged, the defendant's claim should not be entirely dismissed based on the equitable circumstances presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
14-Aug-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
31-Jul-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
19-Jan-2024
Trial
Sub Judge
-
13-Oct-2023
Trial
Sub Judge
-
30-Jun-2023
Trial
Sub Judge
-
28-Apr-2023
Trial
Sub Judge
-
18-Feb-2023
Trial
Sub Judge
-
23-Dec-2022
Trial
Sub Judge
-
15-Oct-2022
Trial
Sub Judge
-
22-Jul-2022
Trial
Sub Judge
-
23-Apr-2022
Trial
Sub Judge
-
04-Feb-2022
Trial
Sub Judge
-
20-Nov-2021
Trial
Sub Judge
-
04-Sep-2021
Trial
Sub Judge
-
03-Jul-2021
Trial
Sub Judge
-
05-Jun-2021
Trial
Sub Judge
-
30-Apr-2021
Issues
Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2021
Issues
Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2021
Issues
Sub Judge
-
10-Nov-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
04-Sep-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
13-May-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
24-Apr-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
07-Feb-2020
Issues
Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2019
Issues
Sub Judge
-
16-Sep-2019
Issues
Sub Judge
-
06-Aug-2019
Issues
Sub Judge
-
26-Jun-2019
Issues
Sub Judge
-
23-Apr-2019
Issues
Sub Judge
-
23-Mar-2019
Issues
Sub Judge
-
21-Mar-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
22-Feb-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
30-Jan-2019
Written Statement
Sub Judge
-
10-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Nov-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 100268/2018
This court order (O.S.No.268/2018, dated 01.08.2025) from a Tamil Nadu court contains testimony from the plaintiff regarding a disputed loan amount of ₹1,70,000. The plaintiff (a lawyer) testifies about providing a cheque to the defendant, subsequent disputes over a promissory note with alleged alterations, and witness accounts regarding the transaction. The order concludes that even if the promissory note is forged, the defendant's claim should not be entirely dismissed based on the equitable circumstances presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts