VELU vs VEERAMANI AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - RAMKUMAR.R — 100253/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTS070006522018

Filing Number

606/2018

Filing Date

29-Oct-2018

Registration No

100253/2018

Registration Date

29-Oct-2018

Court

Sub Court, Sankarankovil

Judge

1-Sub Judge

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VELU

    Adv. KANAGARAJA.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VEERAMANI AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - RAMKUMAR.R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed the petitioner Velu's case, rejecting his claims of ownership over the property in question. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove that the property described in the disputed deed document actually belonged to him, as critical discrepancies in land survey numbers could not be conclusively verified without expert surveyor testimony. Consequently, the petitioner was denied declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and all other remedies sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge

  4. 11-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Judge

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  13. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge

  17. 11-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  19. 25-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  21. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  22. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  23. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  24. 23-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  25. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  26. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  27. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  28. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  29. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  30. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  31. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  32. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  33. 12-Mar-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  34. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  35. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  36. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  37. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  38. 18-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  39. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  40. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  41. 16-Oct-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  42. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  43. 23-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  44. 20-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  45. 31-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  46. 07-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  47. 03-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  48. 19-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  49. 13-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  50. 30-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  51. 28-Apr-2023

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  52. 18-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  53. 11-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  54. 23-Dec-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Sub Judge

  55. 15-Oct-2022

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  56. 22-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  57. 23-Apr-2022

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  58. 25-Feb-2022

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  59. 04-Dec-2021

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  60. 26-Oct-2021

    Trial

    Sub Judge

  61. 23-Oct-2021

    Issues

    Sub Judge

  62. 25-Aug-2021

    Issues

    Sub Judge

  63. 11-Aug-2021

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  64. 13-Jul-2021

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Sub Judge

  65. 07-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  66. 21-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  67. 22-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  68. 19-Mar-2021

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge

  69. 11-Mar-2021

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge

  70. 23-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  71. 17-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  72. 07-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  73. 07-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  74. 17-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  75. 08-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  76. 21-May-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  77. 05-May-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  78. 16-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  79. 24-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Sub Judge

  80. 05-Mar-2020

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge

  81. 06-Feb-2020

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  82. 23-Jan-2020

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  83. 23-Jan-2020

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  84. 22-Jan-2020

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  85. 01-Nov-2019

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  86. 09-Aug-2019

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  87. 27-Jun-2019

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  88. 23-Mar-2019

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  89. 21-Mar-2019

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  90. 21-Feb-2019

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge

  91. 10-Jan-2019

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge

  92. 28-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  93. 29-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100253/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petitioner Velu's case, rejecting his claims of ownership over the property in question. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove that the property described in the disputed deed document actually belonged to him, as critical discrepancies in land survey numbers could not be conclusively verified without expert surveyor testimony. Consequently, the petitioner was denied declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and all other remedies sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case