SELVAKUMAR vs POONKODI Advocate - SELVAKUMAR K — 119/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 13(1)(i-a). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTS070004662020
Filing Number
456/2020
Filing Date
15-Oct-2020
Registration No
119/2020
Registration Date
20-Nov-2020
Court
Sub Court, Sankarankovil
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 11-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SELVAKUMAR
Adv. RAJASINGH.J
Respondent(s)
-
1.POONKODI Advocate - SELVAKUMAR K
Case History
-
12-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Appearance
Sub Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge
-
23-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Sub Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Sub Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Sub Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Sub Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Sub Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
30-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Jun-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
16-Mar-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
23-Feb-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Dec-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Nov-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
27-Oct-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
29-Sep-2022
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This is a matrimonial petition (HMOP No. 119/2020) in Tamil from a family court dated 29.09.2022. The petitioner (wife) seeks relief regarding marital disputes, including allegations of the respondent's (husband) infidelity and abandonment. The court examines claims about maintenance, a child born in 2007, and accusations that the husband maintained an illicit relationship causing the wife emotional distress. The order concludes that no actionable relief can be granted based on the evidence presented, and the petition is dismissed as the court finds insufficient grounds to sustain the wife's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Sep-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Aug-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Jul-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
23-Jun-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
21-Apr-2022
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
21-Apr-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
10-Mar-2022
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
27-Jan-2022
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2021
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
30-Sep-2021
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
15-Sep-2021
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Sub Judge
-
09-Sep-2021
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
05-Aug-2021
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge
-
29-Jul-2021
Counter
Sub Judge
-
30-Jun-2021
Counter
Sub Judge
-
30-Mar-2021
Counter
Sub Judge
-
03-Mar-2021
Counter
Sub Judge
-
03-Feb-2021
Counter
Sub Judge
-
21-Dec-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2020
This is a matrimonial petition (HMOP No. 119/2020) in Tamil from a family court dated 29.09.2022. The petitioner (wife) seeks relief regarding marital disputes, including allegations of the respondent's (husband) infidelity and abandonment. The court examines claims about maintenance, a child born in 2007, and accusations that the husband maintained an illicit relationship causing the wife emotional distress. The order concludes that no actionable relief can be granted based on the evidence presented, and the petition is dismissed as the court finds insufficient grounds to sustain the wife's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts